Skip to main content

Featured

WHO TOLD YOU?

 Before You Accept Another Limit, Answer the Question. What if one of the biggest obstacles standing between you and your future is something you were told—and never questioned? “You can't.” “You're not ready.” “People like you don't make it.” “It's too late.” “Be realistic.” But here is the question: WHO TOLD YOU? That question is about to become more than a conversation. It is becoming music. EXELLO is preparing to unveil WHO TOLD YOU? — a 12-track album built around questions many people spend their entire lives avoiding. And the countdown has begun. THIS IS NOT JUST ANOTHER ALBUM WHO TOLD YOU? explores the invisible forces shaping human choices: identity, attention, distraction, comfort, discipline, time, failure, purpose, character, responsibility, legacy and the future. Instead of simply telling listeners what to think, the project asks them to examine why they think the way they do. Who defined your limitations? Who owns your attention? Where is your time going? ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Breaking: Tinubu Win Again As Tribunal Declares APM’s Petition Incompetent

 President Tinubu Win Again As Tribunal Declares APM's Petition Incompetent

The Presidential Election Petition Court, PEPC, sitting in Abuja, has dismissed the case the Allied Peoples Movement, APM, filed to nullify President Bola Tinubu's election as incompetent. The court held that issues the APM raised in its petition contained pre-election matters that could only be determined by the Federal High Court. Chairman of the panel, Justice Haruna Tsammani, who read the ruling, upheld preliminary objections that all the Respondents raised to challenge the competence of the petition.

Justice Haruna noted that since the petition centred on the qualification or otherwise of President Tinubu to contest the presidential election that was held on February 25, the APM ought to have gone to court within 14 days after Tinubu was nominated by the All Progressives Congress, APC.

He held that since the cause of action bordered on a pre-election matter, the APM needed more locus standi to challenge Tinubu's nomination.

More so, Justice Tsammani held that the Supreme Court had earlier decided that a political party does not have the right to challenge a nomination made by another party.

He held that sections 131 and 237 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended, made provisions for qualifying or disqualifying candidates in an election.

The court noted that the main grouse of the APM was on the alleged invalid nomination of Tinubu's running mate, Kashim Shettima. "Clearly, the claim of qualification is not a qualification of the 3rd Respondent (Tinubu) centred on the alleged invalid nomination of the 4th Respondent (Shettima).

Email Post

Comments

Post a Comment